The Separation of Church and State Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Separation of perform building and State - Essay ExampleThe Separation of Church and StateThe separation of church and show is distancing the relationship of the organized religion and the nation. The second causal agency is that the church might harm the state by starting a war because of wrongful religious convictions. The state also can harm the church when it dictates on religious ceremonies or by forcing religious leadership on civic matters that offend the church. There ar 4 kinds of power Physical, wealth, influence and authority. These powers can be misused in controlling others and can be dangerous when combined. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts perfectly hence no one should have this kind power hence the need to separate the 2 entities. With the separation of church and state, religious leaders should not have no right to interfere in policy decisions made by the government. It is actually inappropriate for policies by the government to be based all on religious beliefs and doctrines. This does not mean that officials in the government should abandon their faith to take jump in the political process or that it is wrong to take up moral and religious determine in politics. Moral dimensions also exist in both social and national policies including budgets which are inborn moral documents. Decisions such as tax increments and public spending affect the society and reflect a communitys priorities. Policy decision that affects peoples lives such as laws condemning murder and theft are rooted from religious teachings and are shared broadly across secular and religious lines. However, a public official has no right to base decisions or cite religious beliefs as a reason for failure to uphold the duties and responsibilities of their office. Religious leaders should only advice or be consulted just now not having a seat at the decision table. They can comment, condemn or support the policies but only as the churchs opinion and not as the general publics. The Family brought a fresh side on influential evangelists such as Charles Finney, Jonathan Edwards and noticey Graham. The book also gives a new misgiving of leaders including Senators Sam Brownback and Hillary Clinton and former senator Dan Coats, Jack Kemps and religious right leaders Chuck Colson, Ted Haggard and Bill Bright. In the book, we learn how the legislative precedent for George Bushs faith initiative was brought up by ideas from The Family and was sponsored by Family members, Republican Senators Ashcroft and Coats with assistance from Hillary Clinton. According to Sharlet (29), the author of The Family, members of this organization rarely step out of the shadows but only on one public event, the Prayer Breakfast which is annually hosted in the Whitehouse. When the government is lobbying efforts of around religious institutions, their activities are ordinarily make in the darkness even as people of numerous influences routinely pressure lawma kers on issues ranging from international relations to healthcare or abortion rights to poverty. This was designed by the government when congress passed the Lobbying Disclosure Act in 1995 (Sharlet 15). The act provided a few exceptions including lobbying communications done by a church. The separation of state and the church is very important to the American government, but it is usually vague and murky. Americans want their legislators to pass approximate laws that result in a good society and good citizenship. Religious leaders do not have two perspectives of good, one secular and one religious. A legislator has to believe in the